Angels and Demons: It’s all about Character
I’m often asked whether I’ve ever written myself in as a character in one of my novels. When I hear that I’m tempted to nod and then describe myself as one of my murderous psychopaths (or something worse): “Sure, I’m really Jeb Taylor in Bloodstone, would you like to meet up and discuss this further, perhaps late tonight in a deserted parking lot?” Or “absolutely! Didn’t you recognize me as the sniveling psychiatrist Dr. Evan Wasserman from The Reach? I’m experimenting on poor defenseless children in my basement right this very moment!”
I wonder if a certain bit of curiosity is what’s really behind the question; is this a variation of the more common one we horror writers get where we’re asked how we can write “that stuff?” In other words, are we really that twisted, and if so, why haven’t we been committed by now?
Or maybe it’s a variant of another common one: “where do you get your ideas?”
It may be hard for people who don’t make stuff up for a living to understand how we writers create people who seem (if we’ve done our jobs right) to be so real. The truth is I have never dropped myself, whole and unharmed, into a novel or story. But I think a bit of me bleeds into every character I create, whether it's a way of thinking, one particular viewpoint, mannerism or physical characteristic. After all, they're all figments of my imagination, these people in my head, and as such, they have to be coming from some part of me... Villains most of all, because to me, the very best villains are those who are complex, who have reasons for why they act the way they do--even if you might loathe them in the end.
Take Wasserman from The Reach as an example. He’s a pretty sick man in many ways, and what he does to young Sarah in the name of science is horrible. But readers can (I hope) understand how he reached that point, even if they don’t agree with it or believe they would do the same. He’s haunted by his own past, unable to live up to his own or others’ expectations, a man who is, in many ways, far weaker than casual observers might think, although he puts on a good show. And he’s in love with a woman who just might be more vicious than he is, although he doesn’t yet know it.
Dr. Wasserman has been pushed into a corner. He’s desperate, and lonely, and afraid. Who among us hasn’t been there at some point?
This is what makes a good villain: one who is fully fleshed out and alive, who makes “bad choices,” as my seven year old might say, but has his or her own reasons for doing so.
On the flip side, a true hero should have a fatal flaw, and more than that, they should be tested at some point during the story and pushed near the breaking point. Perhaps they’ve done something they’re not particularly proud of, something that just might, in the eyes of another character or person from their own past, paint them as a villain. Perhaps that one terrible act comes back to haunt them before too long, and overcoming it is part of their journey. It makes for very compelling fiction.
Let’s face it. Life’s not black and white. We all are heroes to some, villains to others (and before you protest, think back on some of those people from your past you might have hurt in various ways. Relationships that ended badly? How do you think those people would describe you, if asked?)
Good fiction should be about complex characters who live and breathe on the page. And sure, the characters I create are all a part of me in some way, and in order to write them, I must understand them. I must put some little piece of my own heart and soul into their creation, because if I don’t they’ll be flatter and more lifeless than a cardboard cutout.
After all, life isn’t that simple.
Even the devil was an angel, once upon a time.
****************
Nate Kenyon's latest suspense thriller, The Reach, has received raves from readers and critics everywhere, including a starred review in Publishers Weekly, which called it "superb" and said it would "leave readers breathless." His first novel, Bloodstone, was a Bram Stoker Award Finalist, P&E Novel of the Year award winner, and a Five Star bestseller in hardcover, garnering enthusiastic reviews from places such as Publishers Weekly, Library Journal and many others. His third novel, THE BONE FACTORY, will be released from Leisure Books in July 2009. He has a science fiction novella, PRIME, forthcoming from Apex Books, and has published short fiction in magazines such as Shroud, Terminal Frights, Monstros and The Belletrist Review, among others. A member of the Horror Writers of America and International Thriller Writers, Kenyon lives in Massachusetts with his wife and three children. Visit him online at http://natekenyon.com, on MySpace at http://www.myspace.com/natekenyon, or Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1609961&ref=name.
Nate will be giving away copies of The Reach and Bloodstone to two lucky commenters this week. Ask Nate a question or follow the links to each book and tell us which book you'd like to receive and why. Or comment on the excerpt (with something more than "nice excerpt"). And you'll be entered in the drawing. I'll pick a winner on Christmas Eve (December 24) sometime in the evening. Please leave an email address with your comment if you'll not be stopping back to check if you're a winner.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Wow, either of these sound wonderful. I practically grew up reading horror, as it was and still is my mother's preferred reading.
Nate, what influenced you to write horror? Have you always had a fascination with the paranormal or does it stem from something in your past?
If I had to choose which book I would prefer to win, it would probably be The Reach.
Deidre
Hi Deidre--That's a good question. I lost both my parents when I was very young--my father in a car accident when I was 8, my mother to cancer when I was 13--and that certainly influenced the type of story I chose to write. I'd always loved reading and writing, but before that I wrote mysteries and spy stories, while after I turned to darker things.
I do believe that suspense and horror allow us to investigate emotions we might not otherwise feel comfortable looking at; they allow us to get underneath the masks we all wear most of the time, and examine our true natures. Fear is a powerful thing, and it can help us learn quite a bit about ourselves!
Great post. I have been a fan of horror for as long as I can remember but I havent had the chance to read any of your books yet.
I want to read both of them but I think I would like to start with Bloodstone.
Who have been your biggest influences as a writer? In your spare time, what authors do you like to read?
THanks!!
Hi Donnas--I guess I would have to say King, followed pretty closely by a number of writers--Crichton, Peter Straub, Thomas Harris, Shirley Jackson, among many others. I like to read a lot of different writers these days--right now I'm on a Stuart O'Nan kick, and I'm halfway through Songs for the Missing. Before that I read a bunch of Cormac McCarthy. I like Robert Crais, Dennis Lehane. In the horror genre I enjoy Doug Clegg, Tim Lebbon, Dan Simmons, Mike Marshall.
There's an expression that writers must kill their darlings, i.e. if they write a beautiful passage, it stands out like a sore thumb and must be removed.
Do you agree with this, and if so, are there any darlings you felt especially bad about having to kill?
I love the way you talk about your book and characters, Nate. They seem human to you. That makes them seem human to us as well.
My question is one I ask of all authors as it is a problem for me. How do you avoid distractions when writing? Do you sequester yourself?
I look forward to reading your books.
Sue
susie@suesunshine.com
Hi Nate,
I bought a copy of 'The Reach' for my son as part of his Christmas present this year. Now, the more I read about this book, the more I think I want a copy for myself.
I read the clip you emailed me of 'The Bone Factory' and look forward to the publication of that book too. It is going on my BTB list.
Sorry I'm late about posting a winners.
Patrick and Sue D, you are our winners. Please email me (at admin.bookblog@gmail.com) with your preferred choice of The Reach or Bloodstone along with your mailing address. I need to hear from you by Wed. Dec 31 or I will pick new winners.
Sorry all for being delayed with my responses!
Patrick: oh, absolutely. Particularly with Bloodstone, which was almost 150K words originally. I had to cut about 40,000 words! There were a lot of scenes that I loved, but had to go for flow reasons.
I do agree generally that the more you love a passage strictly for its writing, the more likely it is that it needs to go.
Sue: another good question! It's tough. Life tends to intrude, particularly with a day job, three kids, an old house that needs attention, a dog...I could go on. But you just need to make time. I've created an office in our basement that I go to at night to get some work done, but it's not always perfect. I just have to do what I can, when I can.
Hi Karen--glad to hear that! I hope you read them all and drop me a line to let me know what you think.
Congrats to the winners! Happy holidays to all.
Thank you, Nate, for answering my question. It is always nice to find out how other authors handle writer situations.
Thank you for drawing my name. I sent you an email with my choice.
Sue
susie@suesunshine.com